<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gayboomers and the middle aged queer &#187; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gayboomers.net/category/gay-marriage-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gayboomers.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NOM Sign: Murder Gay Couples</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/nom-sign-murder-gay-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/nom-sign-murder-gay-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antigaysign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Advocate.com Editors A National Organization for Marriage supporter offered up a solution for gay marriage at an antigay rally in Indianapolis: putting gay couples to death. A blogger for Blierico.com broke the story and posted a photo of the sign, which a supporter brought to NOM’s “One Man, One Woman bus tour stop in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/nom-sign-murder-gay-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LGBT buying power estimated at $743 billion</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/lgbt-buying-power-estimated-at-743-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/lgbt-buying-power-estimated-at-743-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Celeste Lavin, 365gay.com The total buying power of the adult LGBT community in the U.S. is projected to be $743 billion. This is up from the 2009 projections of $732 billion. Bob Witeck, CEO of Witeck-Combs Communications, the group who published the estimate, said that the study gives the nation a snapshot of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/lgbt-buying-power-estimated-at-743-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP judges back gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/gop-judges-back-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/gop-judges-back-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joshua Green Boston Globe July 15, 2010 LAST WEEK, a US District Court judge in Boston struck down a significant portion of the Defense of Marriage Act, ruling that the controversial 1996 federal law violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution by denying gay and lesbian couples the federal benefits afforded to straight [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/gop-judges-back-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAKING: DC Court Rules Against Foes of Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/breaking-dc-court-rules-against-foes-of-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/breaking-dc-court-rules-against-foes-of-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Michael Cole July 15th, 2010 Big victory for marriage equality in DC! Today the DC Court of Appeals ruled against foes of DC marriage equality who had wanted to put an initiative on the ballot to invalidate same-sex marriages entered into in the District. While Bishop Harry Jackson, a pastor in Maryland, has been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/breaking-dc-court-rules-against-foes-of-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>271 Gay Marriages in Mexico City Since March</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/271-gay-marriages-in-mexico-city-since-march/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/271-gay-marriages-in-mexico-city-since-march/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source:Advocate.com Editors Some 271 same-sex couples have married in Mexico City since a new marriage law took effect in the capital in March. According to the Associated Press, the largest number of same-sex marriages took place in the first month of the new law. The overwhelming majority of those married were Mexican citizens, and slightly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/271-gay-marriages-in-mexico-city-since-march/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining Marriage</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/redefining-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/redefining-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editorial NY Times Published: July 9, 2010 For 14 years, as states, courts and many Americans began to change their minds on the subject, the federal government has clung to its official definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman. On Thursday, a federal judge in Massachusetts finally stood up and said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/redefining-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Topples U.S. Rejection of Gay Unions</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/judge-topples-u-s-rejection-of-gay-unions/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/judge-topples-u-s-rejection-of-gay-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay and lesbian couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By ABBY GOODNOUGH and JOHN SCHWARTZ NYTimes BOSTON — A federal judge in Massachusetts found Thursday that a law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, ruling that gay and lesbian couples deserve the same federal benefits as heterosexual couples. Judge Joseph L. Tauro of United States District Court in Boston sided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/judge-topples-u-s-rejection-of-gay-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>True Blood Actor Supports Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/true-blood-actor-supports-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/true-blood-actor-supports-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lafayette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source: Advocate.com July 02, 2010 By Jeffrey Gerson In an interview with Vibe, Nelsan Ellis, who plays the stereotype-shattering gay character Lafayette in HBO&#8217;s hit series True Blood, said that he supports gay marriage. In the interview, Ellis discussed his experience as a straight Christian man creating a believable gay character. He mentioned that he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/true-blood-actor-supports-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Add Pay to Cover a Tax for Same-Sex Benefits</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/google-to-add-pay-to-cover-a-tax-for-same-sex-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/google-to-add-pay-to-cover-a-tax-for-same-sex-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this article interesting because I have this same type of insurance through my partner at GM. As retirees we have very much decreased coverage and much higher co-pays or &#8220;all pays&#8221; such as all doctor visits including specialists in their office, for which they pay nothing. I really should be glad we have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/07/google-to-add-pay-to-cover-a-tax-for-same-sex-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules for Petition Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://gayboomers.net/2010/06/supreme-court-rules-for-petition-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://gayboomers.net/2010/06/supreme-court-rules-for-petition-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donwill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayboomers.net/?p=5515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source: Advocate.com (GETTY IMAGES) In a Thursday decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of disclosing the names of petitioners who called for a ballot measure that could have repealed an expanded domestic partnership rights law in Washington State last year. The 8-1 ruling, considered in the heated context of the nationwide marriage equality [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gayboomers.net/2010/06/supreme-court-rules-for-petition-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
